I can add to it: first you clearly don't just need to recompile, since PCSX2 is a JIT, so porting to ARM means rewriting a code generator for it. I remember a post in forum from Gregory Henault explaining far and large why it was not such a good idea / hard if you want to search. The only that i know is the Damon PS2 that is available on Android Until today, there isnt a PCSX2 port for ARM until today. I don't think it's one of those emulators that are coded in a way they won't even work on 64bit systems. When you think about it in that sense, then ya, its not very good (to the point in which the best solution would be to start a completely new ps2 emu project).īut for all intensive purposes it is a working emulator.Quoting: WJMazepas Quoting: slaapliedje Quoting: TheLinuxPlebIs there going to be any ARM version? I think i saw somewhere that this is x86 only.Pretty sure PCSX2 is all open source, so in theory just needs a recompile. (ofcourse it would be hard to do that for everything), but it should be the goal worked towards. It is what an emulator should be and how it should be done. But there are also a lot of games with major issues or only work in software rendering or dont work at all.ĭolphin should be a standard used for comparison. It is a working emulator that can play a good majority of games without too much problem and is fairly accurate in what it can play. (its more a temporary solution) Which means the emulator is not behaving like the real console, and can/will cause tons of bugs/issues. The emulator is in a 'working' state just because of game specific hacks, which is bad practice. Pcsx2 is considered bad because the code base is a jumbled mess no one can read/understand (which makes working on it hard if not impossible, meaning the development suffers greatly).Īlso the gsdx plugin has too many issues, which are pretty much unfixable at this point w/o completely re-writing it from scratch.

Pcsx2 emulator too fast